Like Plex, iBroadcast promises an easy transition and set-up. But dig around a little in the FAQ and there’s a better sense of what’s going on. It doesn’t have as much detail on its website, which is kind of a shiny storefront without anything to buy or search. IBroadcast is another well-reviewed and highly recommended cloud-based music library. There might be some additional fees, but most of the important music-based services similar to GPM look to be free or low cost. It’s got a 4.2 rating from Android users, a 4.7 from Apple users and a 4.1 from Roku users. For people who also want to stream, that’s an option too, powered by Tidal. It promises to add cover art, photos, bios, tour info (when the world gets back to touring, that is), AND it’s welcoming of different types of music files, including FLAC. Once you’ve downloaded our app on your favourite device, you’ll be up and streaming everything in minutes.” Plex magically scans and organizes your files, automatically sorting your media beautifully and intuitively in your Plex library. “Once you download our free and easy-to-use software where you store your files (usually a computer or external hard drive), it takes care of the rest. “Plex is the key to personal media bliss,” the website says. It offers a cloud-based library for MP3s and video files alike, along with podcasts and web-based shows. Here are some of the options for people who want to continue having access to their personally owned music files via a cloud-based service in a fashion similar to what we’ve liked about GPM for the past 10 or so years: If anyone else has, please let me know and I’ll update this article accordingly, with thanks. If you need to be moved over now and haven’t received your invitation, you can request one, as Google Play told a twitter user in response to an article earlier in this week.Īlso, for the record, I’ve asked GPM a few questions that others have raised this week, pertaining to whether you need to pay for YouTube Music to utilize all its features, most importantly the ability to upload your own music library, but so far I haven’t received any answers directly. That leaves users of Google Play Music – or GPM as the cool kids call it – wondering what to do next.Īfter some searching, head-scratching, and asking around, it turns out there are a handful of options, some better than others, some free, some free with a paid tier, to be considered as replacements for GPM if you don’t want to go the suggested route of transitioning everything over to YouTube Music.įor the record (no pun intended), GPM says it will be transitioning people over by invitation at this point, to allow for a gradual movement onto the new(ish/er) service. When the QC spends more time on the desk (exploring the device, building presets, reamping etc), I drop the interface.Many of us are still trying to come to terms with the loss of Google Play Music.Īt some point this year, the incredibly user-friendly and really efficient cloud/library/streaming service/radio mimicker/friend to all will fade away into the internet graveyard of great ideas killed off for…some reason. When my QC spends more time on the floor, I use an interface by default. If you find it annoying to disconnect and reconnect going back and forth between the interface and QC, stick with the interface. However, if YOU feel sound quality is better that way - go for it. You experience an extra unnecessary round of DA - AD conversion.Specifically, I don’t think it makes sense to connect your QC as an input to another interface: you don’t like having the bulky QC on your desk, or you want to record multiple instruments/mics simultaneously). Do whatever is more convenient in terms of workflow (e.g. In terms of mixing, it doesn’t really matter unless you can hear a difference between the QC and Clarett.The wet will be identical (up to latency compensation) to DI → reamp, so you can play with you core tones and the nicer feel of wet vs DI, but then reamp the DI as needed once you have a good take. If you enjoy recording wet (or wet + DI), I’d definitely go QC.You can then use the QC to reamp via USB from your daw. If you enjoy recording pure DI, use whichever device you prefer in terms of latency and DI “quality”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |